A guide to
the preparation of Feasibility Studies/ Situation Analyses
This guidance
is offered to assist partners in preparing documentation to accompany
project applications. It must be recognised that this is a valuable
process in itself but does not guarantee a successful application.
Overall there
is an aim to unite people and communities to take charge of their
own situation, become self reliant and active in the decision making
process which will affect their future.
Grant Making
Principles
There is a clear
emphasis on working with groups that can prove that they wish to help
the most disadvantaged in society. Examples of this are those with
a disability, people coping with HIV/AIDS and women and girls and
in general people who are poor and marginalised.
Local people must
be consulted and involved throughout. Beneficiaries must be fully
integrated into the planning, implementation, development and management
of the project.
Work must be integrated
with other organisations, learning from experience and sharing this
in order to strengthen existing organisations. Attempts should be
made to work with the local, regional or national government and existing
organisations to improve ways of doing things and to change unfair
rules laws or accepted practices. Seek to influence people in power
to make these necessary changes.
Beneficiaries
should be the motive power behind the project. Major grant makers
may fund start up costs, capital and running costs including essential
equipment, salaries, transport, rent and education and training. Organisations
must become more effective and more answerable to those people that
they represent. In this case:
· Grants
are seen as making a long- term commitment over a period of up to
five years.
· Learning from experience and the ongoing improvement of practice
are seen as fundamental.
· A willingness
to support those ideas which are difficult to fund. For example where
peoples' needs have not been recognised, where few people are aware
of the problem, the work is sensitive in nature or where the country
or region is not popular with other grant-makers.
· Equal
opportunities must be evident throughout the organisation.
· Regular
reports and updates will be required.
· There
is a clear directive concerning disabled people. There is a wish to
change attitudes so that the disabled can feel a valued part of the
society in which they live. There needs to be a sound understanding
of local cultural beliefs and attitudes towards disability and the
barriers that often keep the disabled in poverty thus preventing them
from reaching their potential and playing a full part in their community.
Grant-makers wish to support work which helps the
disabled to set their own priorities and co-operate to achieve lasting
change in their community.
SITUATION ANALYSIS
A Situation Analysis will be required for large projects. There may
not be any provision for funding a situation analysis in isolation
from the main project. The applicant will usually have to meet the
cost of the work involved.
It is expected
that applicants will accurately carry out the following tasks:-
· Produce a thorough analysis of the situation in the area.
· Establish who is at greatest disadvantage
· Identify the issues underlying poverty and marginalisation.
· Identify how the situation is currently being dealt with
· Stipulate any project partners
· Identify any other beneficiaries or other interested parties
( Stakeholders)
· Indicate why this target group has been chosen
· Indicate why this particular geographical location has been
chosen. Justify the location.
· State why you think your project will actually meet the needs
of the most disadvantaged
· Hold community level discussions where a range of marginalised
groups can express their opinions and needs. Keep an accurate record
of these discussions and produce an action plan identifying the priorities.
· Carry out research using questionnaires, interviews with
government officials and obtain appropriate statistics if available.
You will need to demonstrate the comparative disadvantage of your
chosen geographic area. Priority will be given to those projects which
can specifically demonstrate this point.
· Explain why you are working with certain groups and not others.
· Indicate how you will you share the information which you
have gathered about disadvantage. Issue a summary report to all interest
groups perhaps.
· Identify all relevant stakeholders who might have an influence
on your desired outcomes
· Identify all possible allies.
· Identify who needs to be positively engaged and persuaded
of the value of this work
· Identify which government bodies and service providers (e.g.
church) work in sympathy and will
co-operate with this initiative
· Indicate if HIV/AIDS has a significant impact on this community
and how you planned to take account of this
· Demonstrate that you have the skills and experience to manage
inputs and account properly for all project costs.
The overall aim
is to assist poor people to organise themselves so that their voice
can be heard. To demand better services and access to them. To empower
poor people to demand their human rights, to do things for themselves
but also make demands of those people in power.
We would advise
that the way to approach feasibility studies is to gather information
that will be of use to the non-government organisation applicant irrespective
of whether the project application is approved.
The approach we advise is that each requirement is studied carefully
and the necessary consultation procedures required to meet them be
devised - i.e. questionnaires, interviews, statistical studies, government
legislation, UK DFID Country Strategy papers, etc.
Most applications
from NGOs almost wholly relate to service provision and our partners
may legitimately wonder why it is difficult to get money for this
from major grant givers. The attitude appears to be that services
are best delivered through government departments rather than charities
and NGOs (The FIOH Fund does not agree with this approach although
it does recognise the importance of education and empowerment to help
people obtain their rights under the law).
Many small trusts
and other grant givers do, however, focus on different aspects of
service delivery and the trustees will seek to help the Fund's partners
by making them aware of grant giving criteria.
We must point
out that the unrestricted reserves of the FIOH Fund are small and
that most applications will have to be submitted in accordance with
the criteria of specific grant makers. This will be the responsibility
of the NGO applicant. Any applications that do not meet this requirement
are unlikely to be considered.
Applicants
are also advised that major grant givers are likely to ask for a an
'independent referee' separate from the Charity who is based in the
UK and is familiar with the work of the applicant NGO.